Whistleblower Lawyer

Is assigning a sales employee a low performing territory an adverse employment action?

Numerous courts have held that assigning an employee a lower performing territory or accounts constitutes an adverse action. See, e.g., McArdle v. Dell Prods., L.P., … Continued

Top-Rated Employment Lawyers Representing Employees in Washington DC

We are a top-rated firm focused on representing employees in a variety of workplace-related disputes, including:

Whistleblower retaliation;
Glass ceiling discrimination;
Sexual harassment;
Race discrimination;
Gender discrimination, including Equal Pay Act claims;
LGBT discrimination;
Religious discrimination;
Disability discrimination;
Pregnancy discrimination; and
Age discrimination

No one should be denied an employment opportunity due to unlawful discrimination. To schedule a preliminary consultation, click here. Washingtonian magazine named two of our attorneys top whistleblower lawyers. U.S. News and Best Lawyers® have named Zuckerman Law a Tier 1 Law Firmin Labor and Employment in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area.

Washington DC Anti-Discrimination Law

The DC Human Rights Act is one of the strongest anti-discrimination laws nationwide. It prohibits discrimination based on

race,
color,
religion,
national origin,
sex,
age,
marital status,
personal appearance,
sexual
orientation,
gender identity or expression,
family responsibilities,
genetic information,
disability,
matriculation, or
political affiliation.

Experienced Washington DC Employment Lawyers

Hiring a proven and effective advocate is critical to obtaining the maximum recovery in a discrimination case. Contact us today at 202-262-8959 to find out how we can help you.

Resources from DC OHR About Washington DC Anti-Discrimination Laws

Know Your Rights: Combatting Discrimination and Retaliation in Washington DC

What is whistleblower retaliation?

What do I need to prove to win my employment discrimination case?

What types of employment actions do discrimination laws cover?

What kinds of workplace discrimination are illegal?

What is retaliation?

What damages are available in an employment discrimination case?

Can I recover punitive damages as part of my employment discrimination claim?

What are emotional distress damages and how do I prove them?

How do courts measure emotional distress damages in employment discrimination cases?

What is glass ceiling discrimination?

What is a hostile work environment?

Report Improper Revenue Recognition and Qualify for an SEC Whistleblower Award

Reporting Improper Revenue Recognition to SEC Improper revenue recognition is the most common accounting violation targeted by the SEC. A January 2021 report issued … Continued

Improper Revenue Recognition and the SEC Whistleblower Program

On September 7, 2017, the SEC announced that financial services firm State Street agreed to pay more than $35 million to settle charges that it fraudulently charged secret mark-ups for transition management services. According to the SEC’s order, the scheme generated approximately $20 million in improper revenue for the firm. After a client discovered the overbilling scheme, State Street attempted to cover it up by blaming it on a “fat finger error.” The SEC later determined that this statement was a misrepresentation as the mark-ups were done intentionally.

We have successfully represented whistleblowers at the SEC disclosing revenue recognition fraud. For more information about revenue recognition schemes, see our article: How to Report Improper Revenue Recognition and Earn an SEC Whistleblower Award.

If you have information that may qualify for an SEC whistleblower award, contact the Director of our SEC whistleblower practice at [email protected] or call our leading SEC whistleblower lawyers at (202) 930-5901 or (202) 262-8959. All inquiries are confidential.

In conjunction with our courageous clients, we have helped the SEC halt multi-million dollar investment schemes, expose violations at large publicly traded companies and return funds to defrauded investors. Read our tips for SEC whistleblowers and Forbes column about the success of the SEC whistleblower program.

Contact us today to find out the strategies that we have successfully employed to secure SEC whistleblower awards for our whistleblower clients.

SEC Whistleblower Program and Revenue Recognition Fraud

Under the SEC Whistleblower Program, whistleblowers are eligible to receive an award for providing the SEC with original information about a violation of the federal securities laws, including improper revenue recognition. If the SEC uses a whistleblower’s information to bring a successful enforcement action, the whistleblower is eligible to receive 10% to 30% of the monetary sanctions collected as an award. Thus, if a whistleblower had provided original information to the SEC about State Street’s overbilling scheme, he or she could be eligible to receive an award of up to $10.5 million.

The SEC Whistleblower Program also protects the confidentiality of whistleblowers and does not disclose information that might directly or indirectly reveal a whistleblower’s identity. Moreover, whistleblowers can submit an anonymous tip to the SEC if represented by an attorney. Importantly, even compliance personnel, auditors (external and internal), accountants, officers, and directors may be eligible to receive rewards under the program.

Revenue Recognition Fraud SEC Whistleblower Awards

Since 2012, the SEC Whistleblower Office has awarded nearly $1 billion in awards to whistleblowers. The largest SEC whistleblower award to date is $114 million. Tips from whistleblowers have enabled the SEC to take enforcement actions resulting in more than $2.7 billion in financial remedies. In fact, one tip about accounting violations that improperly inflated revenue by $80 million has already resulted in a $22 million SEC award.

For more information about the SEC Whistleblower Program, see our eBook Tips from SEC Whistleblower Attorneys to Maximize an SEC Whistleblower Award. Click below to hear SEC whistleblower lawyer Matt Stock’s tips for SEC whistleblowers:

SEC Takes Aim at Improper Revenue Recognition

According to a Report Pursuant to Section 704 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, during the five years preceding the enactment of SOX, the “SEC brought the greatest number of actions [involving issuer financial-report violations] in the area of improper revenue recognition: 126 of the 227 enforcement matters involved such conduct, including the fraudulent reporting of fictitious sales, improper timing of revenue recognition, and improper valuation of revenue.” Years later, the SEC continues to focus on issuer reporting and disclosure violations, including improper revenue recognition.

According to the SEC’s 2020 Annual Report to Congress on the SEC Whistleblower Program, a majority of whistleblowers tips submitted to the SEC Whistleblower Program relate to violations with corporate disclosures and financials:

In FY 2011, 51 tips related to corporate disclosures and financials.
In FY 2012, 547 tips related to corporate disclosures and financials.
In FY 2013, 557 tips related to corporate disclosures and financials.
In FY 2014, 610 tips related to corporate disclosures and financials.
In FY 2015, 687 tips related to corporate disclosures and financials.
In FY 2016, 938 tips related to corporate disclosures and financials.
In FY 2017, 954 tips related to corporate disclosures and financials.
In FY 2018, 983 tips related to corporate disclosures and financials.
In FY 2019, 1,107 tips related to corporate disclosures and financials.
In FY 2020, 1,710 tips related to corporate disclosures and financials.

A 2016 Harvard article also found that the most common SEC enforcement actions concerning accounting violations are related to “inaccurate representations of revenue.”

As discussed in an article in CFODIVE titled Improper revenue recognition tops SEC fraud cases, the SEC continues to focus on revenue recognition fraud, and whistleblower disclosures about improper revenue recognition schemes may qualify whistleblowers for an SEC whistleblower award.

SEC Enforcement Actions for Improper Revenue Recognition

The following SEC enforcement actions are examples of the types of improper revenue recognition schemes that could qualify for an SEC award:

Fraudulent Overbilling Schemes

SEC v. Garthright: The SEC charged SMF Energy Corp. and its officers with accounting fraud for inflating revenues through a fraudulent billing scheme. According to the SEC’s complaint, the billing scheme “increased the amount of gallons of fuel invoiced beyond what was actually delivered to customers,” which resulted in false and misleading disclosures in the company’s SEC filings. The billing scheme circumvented SMF Energy’s internal accounting controls and led to, among other things, materially overstated revenues, profit margins, shareholders’ equity, and net income in its SEC filings. The scheme resulted in several SEC violations, including the failure to maintain a system of internal controls sufficient to ensure that its customers were charged in accordance with their respective contracts, the failure to record revenues and liabilities in accordance with GAAP, and the failure to design (or to cause others to design) disclosure controls and procedures that would have caused the company to disclose and report that it recognized revenue from improper charges to customers. The SEC disgorged all ill-gotten profits and proceeds received as a result of the actions.
SEC v. MedQuist, Inc.: The SEC charged MedQuist with accounting fraud when it secretly inflated customer bills by increasing the number of lines of medical test that it purportedly transcribed. According to the SEC’s complaint, the “scheme was able to continue for several years because the unit of measure upon which bills to many customers were based . . . could not be verified by customers. Knowing that its customers were unable to verify line counts on bills, [MedQuist] . . . manipulate[d] line counts on customer bills to reach specific revenue and margin targets.” MedQuist and its Director, President, and Chief Operating Officer were charged with violating securities laws.

Improper Timing of Revenue Recognition

SEC v. L3 Technologies, Inc.: The SEC charged L3 for failing to maintain accurate books and records and failing to maintain adequate internal controls when the company improperly recorded $17.9M in revenue from a contract by creating invoices associated with unresolved claims that were not delivered when the revenue was recorded. According to the SEC’s order, employees “immediately reported concerns regarding potential violations of L3’s accounting policies and internal accounting controls to L3’s internal ethics department,” but the subsequent ethics review failed to uncover the misconduct due, in part, to “a failure by ethics investigators to adequately understand the billing process.”
SEC v. Dickson: The SEC charged IGI Inc. with fraudulent accounting practices and reporting, inadequate internal controls, and books-and-records violations for engaging in fraudulent sales-cutoff practices and other improper accounting practices. As a result of the improper sales-cutoff practices, “IGI misstated its assets, revenues, and net income” for several years.
SEC v. Alere Inc.: On September 28, 2017, medical manufacturer Alere Inc. agreed to pay more than $13 million to settle charges that it committed accounting fraud through its subsidiaries. According to the Order, Alere’s subsidiary in South Korea improperly inflated revenues by recording sales for products that were being stored at warehouses or otherwise not yet delivered to the customers. The SEC uncovered this “bill and hold” scheme along with other improper revenue recognition practices at several other subsidiaries.
SEC v. Maxwell Technologies, Inc.: Maxwell Technologies paid $2.8 million as a penalty for a scheme to grow revenue by booking contingent sales of auto parts as revenue. Evidence of the scheme included falsified purchase orders and secret side arrangements to keep the scheme hidden.

Fictitious Sales

SEC v. Putnam: The SEC charged Anicom Inc. and its directors with violating federal securities laws after the company falsely reported millions of dollars of nonexistent sales to inflate net income by more than $20M. According to the SEC’s complaint, Anicom included in its financial statements millions of dollars in sales to a fictitious customer, SCL Integration.

Tips for Qualifying for an Revenue Recognition SEC Whistleblower Bounty

SEC Whistleblower Lawyers Representing Revenue Recognition Whistleblowers

If you have information that you would like to report to the SEC, contact an SEC whistleblower attorney at leading whistleblower firm Zuckerman Law for a free, confidential consultation about your case by calling 202-262-8959.

For more information about SEC whistleblower rewards and protections:

See our column in Forbes: One Billion Reasons Why The SEC Whistleblower-Reward Program Is Effective.
See our column in Going Concern: Sarbanes-Oxley 15 Years Later: Accountants Need to Speak Up Now More Than Ever.
See our post in Accounting Today: Whistleblower Protections and Incentives for Auditors and Accountants.
See our post in The Compliance and Ethics Blog: Shkreli Trial Reveals the Challenges Faced by Compliance Whistleblowers.

SEC Whistleblower Law Firm Representing Revenue Recognition Whistleblowers

Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Protections for Revenue Recognition SEC Whistleblowers

whistleblower_lawyers_012017_infographic

Former Office of Special Counsel Officials Release Guide to Whistleblower Protection Act

Guide to Whistleblower Protection Act Whistleblower attorneys Eric Bachman and Jason Zuckerman, former senior officials at the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, have released a … Continued

Can an incomplete Section 303 MD&A disclosure give rise to Section 10(b) securities fraud liability?

Yes. “Item 303 provides a critical backstop to prevent unscrupulous issuers from exploiting the trust that reasonable investors place in submissions made in purported compliance … Continued

What is the standard for summary judgment in an employment discrimination or retaliation case?

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the movant must show that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the movant … Continued

What is the duty to mitigate damages?

To obtain economic damages (lost pay and benefits) in an employment-related lawsuit, you must show that you tried to mitigate your damages, i.e., you searched … Continued

Image of Does the failure to name the employer's business entity correctly in an OSHA administrative complaint constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies?

Does the failure to name the employer’s business entity correctly in an OSHA administrative complaint constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies?

Courts recognize that many employers operate under a complex legal structure and therefore it can be difficult to name the precise legal entity that employed … Continued

Consumer Product Safety Whistleblower Protection Law

Prompted by concerns of lead-laden children’s toys and insufficient regulation of consumer product safety, consumer product safety, Congress enacted the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) on August 14, 2008. The CPSIA strengthens the authority of the CPSC and imposes new certification requirements on manufacturers and distributors.

To ensure that workers can blow the whistle on consumer product safety issues, Congress included in the CPSIA a whistleblower protection provision that prohibits manufacturers, private labelers, distributors, and retailers from retaliating against an employee because the employee provided information to an employer, a regulatory agency, or a state attorney general about a reasonably perceived violation of any law enforced by the CPSC. The regulations implementing the CPSC whistleblower protection law are available by clicking here.

best whistleblower lawyers Leading whistleblower firm Zuckerman Law represents consumer product safety whistleblowers nationwide. If you are seeking representation in a whistleblower retaliation case, click here, or call our consumer product safety whistleblower retaliation lawyers at 202-262-8959 to schedule a confidential consultation.

Click here to read reviews from clients that we have represented in whistleblower rewards and whistleblower retaliation matters.

See our tips to combat whistleblower retaliation and maximize your recovery.

Who is Protected Under the CPSIA Whistleblower Retaliation Law?

The CPSIA whistleblower law applies to manufacturers, private labelers, distributors, and retailers. A consumer product is

any article, or component part thereof, produced or distributed (i) for sale to a consumer for use in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation, or otherwise, or (ii) for the personal use, consumption or enjoyment of a consumer in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation, or otherwise ....

15 U.S.C. § 2052(a)(5). A product that is not "customarily produced or distributed for sale to, or use or consumption by, or enjoyment of, a consumer” will likely not be deemed a consumer product. 15 U.S.C. § 2052(a)(5)(A).

What Whistleblowing is Protected Under the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act?

The CPSIA prohibits an employer from terminating or otherwise discriminating against an employee because the employee

provided information to the employer, the federal government, or a state attorney general "relating to any violation of, or any act or omission the employee reasonably believes to be a violation of any provision" of an order, rule, regulation, standard, or ban enforced by the CPSC;
testified, assisted, or participated in a proceeding concerning a violation of a CPSC rule or regulation, or
refused to participate in an activity, policy, practice, or assigned task that the employee reasonably believes violates a CPSC rule or regulation.

Examples of protected whistleblowing include:

Reporting violations of the standard for the flammability of children’s sleepwear;
Disclosing information about the use of consumer patching compounds containing free-form asbestos;
Reporting an employer’s violation of a safety standard for creating architectural glazing materials; and
Reporting choking incidents involving marbles, small balls, latex balloons, and other small parts.

The CPSIA protects employees who blow the whistle in the normal course of performing their job duties.

What acts of retaliation are prohibited by the Consumer Product Safety Whistleblower Law?

What is the Causation Standard Under the CPSIA?

What Remedies or Damages are Available to Consumer Product Safety Whistleblowers?

How to File a Consumer Product Safety Whistleblower Retaliation Action

The statute of limitations for filing a consumer product safety whistleblower claim is 180 days from the date on which the employee is first informed of the adverse employment action (which can be earlier than the effective date of the adverse action).

After the complaint is filed, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) investigates the complaint and may order preliminary relief, including reinstatement of the whistleblower to his previous position. Either the whistleblower or the employer can appeal OSHA's determination by requesting to have the full case heard by a Dept. of Labor administrative judge.

If the Department of Labor has not issued a final decision with 210 days of the filing of the complaint, the whistleblower can remove the case to federal court.

Lawyers Representing Consumer Product Safety Whistleblowers

If you have suffered retaliation for disclosing consumer product safety hazards, click here or call us at 202-262-8959 to schedule a preliminary consultation.

Some disclosures about consumer product safety are also protected under the whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, such as a company concealing from its shareholders a significant product defect or a product recall. For more information about protections and remedies for corporate whistleblowers, download our free guide Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protection: Robust Protection for Corporate Whistleblowers.

SEC whistleblower rules

InsideOSHAOnline Reports on Whistleblower Firm’s Efforts to Combat Gag Clauses

An article in InsideOSHAOnline.com titled Whistleblower Attorney Backs New OSHA Guidance On Settlement Reviews reports on the successful efforts of Tom Devine, Legal Director of the Government … Continued