SEASONED AND EFEECTIVE WHISTLEBLOWER REWARDS AND WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION ATTORNEYS
Recently the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners published a profile of SEC whistleblower lawyers Matt Stock’s success working with whistleblowers to fight fraud:
For more information about the SEC Whistleblower Program, see our Whistleblower Page and download the eBook Tips from SEC Whistleblower Attorneys to Maximize an SEC Whistleblower Award. Click below to hear an SEC whistleblower lawyer’s tips for SEC whistleblowers:
Resources About SEC Whistleblower Program
- What is the SEC Office of the Whistleblower?
- What are the largest SEC whistleblower awards?
- Can I submit a tip anonymously to the SEC Office of the Whistleblower?
- What exactly does anonymous whistleblowing entail?
- What employment protections are available for SEC whistleblowers?
- What violations qualify for an SEC whistleblower award?
- Can the SEC bring enforcement actions against international schemes?
- Who is an “eligible” SEC whistleblower?
- Can compliance personnel, auditors, officers or directors qualify for SEC whistleblower awards?
- Can I submit a claim if I had some involvement in the fraud or misconduct?
- Can culpable whistleblowers qualify for SEC whistleblower awards?
- Do I have to report a potential violation to my company before reporting it to the SEC?
- What type of evidence should I provide to the SEC?
- Can I use confidential company documents to expose fraud?
- Can I disclose secret recordings to the SEC?
- Can I submit a tip if I agreed to a confidentiality provision in an employment/severance agreement?
- When is the best time to report the fraud or misconduct to the SEC?
- What is “original information”?
- Can I submit an SEC Whistleblower claim if the SEC already has an open investigation into the matter?
- How might my information “lead to” a successful SEC enforcement action?
- What “related actions” qualify for an SEC whistleblower award?
- How do the best SEC whistleblower law firms advocate for whistleblowers?
- How do I choose the best whistleblower attorney?
- Why should I choose the Zuckerman Law to represent me in my SEC whistleblower claim?
- How do I submit a tip to the SEC Office of the Whistleblower?
- What happens after I submit a tip to the SEC Office of the Whistleblower?
- What is the full process for a whistleblower to receive an award?
- What factors does the SEC consider when determining the amount of the award?
- What happens after I apply for an SEC whistleblower award?
- What is the process to appeal the SEC’s award determination?
- How long does it take to receive an SEC whistleblower award?
Dallas Hammer
Summary
Dallas Hammer is a Principal at Zuckerman Law and leads the firm’s cybersecurity whistleblower practice and Virginia employment practice. Recently the Wall Street Journal quoted Dallas Hammer in an article titled Cybersecurity Whistleblowers Are Growing Corporate Challenge.
He has broad experience litigating whistleblower retaliation, discrimination, and employment-related disputes
-
Professionalism
(5)
-
Ethical
(5)
-
Honesty
(5)
Overall
User Review
( votes)
The whistleblower protection provision of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act (“STAA”) protects truck drivers from retaliation where they engage in protected whistleblowing, which includes:
- Refusing to operate a vehicle because: (i) The operation violates a regulation, standard, or order of the United States related to commercial motor vehicle safety, health, or security; or (ii) He or she has a reasonable apprehension of serious injury to himself or herself or the public because of the vehicle’s hazardous safety or security condition;
- Accurately reporting hours on duty; or
- Cooperating with a safety or security investigation by the Secretary of Transportation, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the National Transportation Safety Board; or
- Furnishing information to the Secretary of Transportation, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the National Transportation Safety Board, or any Federal, State, or local regulatory or law enforcement agency as to the facts relating to any accident or incident resulting in injury or death to an individual or damage to property occurring in connection with commercial motor vehicle transportation.
In two recent cases, truck drivers prevailed where they were terminated for refusing to drive a damaged truck and refusing to drive while on prescription medication.
Proving a Trucking Safety Whistleblower Protection Claim
A trucking whistleblower must prove the following to prevail in a STAA whistleblower retaliation claim:
- The employee engaged in protected conduct;
- The employer was aware of the protected whistleblowing;
- The employer took an adverse action; and
- The protected whistleblower was a contributing factor in the employer’s decision to take the adverse action.
Prohibited STAA Whistleblower Retaliation
STAA proscribes a wide range of retaliatory adverse actions, including discharging, disciplining or discriminating against a whistleblowing employee regarding pay, terms or privileges of employment. Examples include blacklisting, termination, suspension, demotion, reduction in salary, failure to hire, or any act that would deter a reasonable person from engaging in protected activity.
Remedies Available to Prevailing Trucking Industry Whistleblowers
A prevailing trucking industry whistleblower can recover:
- Reinstatement,
- Lost wages and benefits,
- Damages for emotional distress and anguish, humiliation, harm to reputation, and other non-economic harms,
- Attorney fees and litigation costs, and
- Punitive damages up to $250,000.
Recently, a truck driver was awarded $150,000 after he was fired for refusing to drive in unsafe weather conditions.
In Fink v. R&L Transfer, Inc., the ARB affirmed an award of compensatory damages in the amount of $100,000.00, and punitive damages in the amount of $50,000 to a truck driver who was terminated for refusing to drive in unsafe winter weather conditions.
How to File a Trucking Safety Whistleblower Retaliation Action
A STAA whistleblowing complaint must be filed initially with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) within 180 days of when the whistleblower knew or should have known of the retaliatory action.
The whistle-blower protection provision of the STAA provides a strong remedy for whistleblowers in the trucking industry. To learn if you have a potential STAA whistleblower retaliation claim, call the Zuckerman Law Whistleblower Protection Help Line at 202-262-8959 or email [email protected].
Are whistleblowers in the nuclear industry protected against retaliation?
Section 211 of the Energy Reorganization Act (ERA) protects employees who disclose concerns about nuclear safety or a violation a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rule or regulation.
To learn more about whistleblower protections, call the whistleblower lawyers at Zuckerman Law at 202-262-8959, or click here.
Protected Nuclear Safety Whistleblowing
The ERA whistleblower anti-retaliation provision protects employees in the nuclear industry for engaging in protected whistleblowing, including:
- Raising concerns about nuclear safety;
- Refusing to engage in activities prohibited under either the ERA or AEA provided the employee has identified the alleged illegality;
- Testifying before Congress or at any Federal or State proceeding regarding any provision of the ERA or the AEA;
- Commencing or causing to be commenced a proceeding under or the enforcement of the ERA or AEA, or testifying in any such proceeding; or
- Assisting or participating in any other action to promote nuclear safety.
The ERA protects disclosures to an employer and disclosures to the NRC. Click here to report a safety or security concern directly to the NRC.
Prohibited Retaliation Against Nuclear Safety Whistleblowers
Section 211 of the ERA prohibits a broad range of retaliatory actions, including termination, harassment, suspension, demotion, blacklisting/refusal to hire, and any act that would dissuade a reasonable person from engaging further protected activity.
Recently, OSHA awarded $260,000 to a nuclear whistleblower who was wrongfully terminated after reporting safety concerns concerning a construction project at the Wolf Creek Generating Station, including breaches of minimum soil coverage requirements for emergency service water piping.
Proving ERA Whistleblower Retaliation
To prevail on an ERA whistleblower complaint, a complainant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the complainant’s protected whistleblowing was a contributing factor in the adverse action. A common source of indirect evidence of retaliation is “temporal proximity” between the protected whistleblowing and the adverse action. The closer the temporal proximity, the greater the causal connection there is to the alleged retaliation.
If the complainant’s protected activity was a contributing factor in the adverse action, the employer may avoid liability only if it demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the same unfavorable personnel action in the absence of the protected whistleblowing. This is known as the “same decision defense.” To assess whether an employer has proven that defense by clear and convincing evidence, DOL evaluates the following factors: (1) whether the employer’s evidence meets the plain meaning of “clear” and “convincing”; (2) whether the employer’s evidence indicates subjectively that the employer “would have” taken the same adverse action; and (3) whether facts that the employer relies on would change in the “absence of” the protected activity.”
Remedies for Prevailing Nuclear Safety Whistleblowers
A prevailing nuclear whistleblower can obtain:
- Reinstatement,
- Lost wages,
- Damages for emotional distress and anguish, humiliation, harm to reputation, and other non-economic harms, and
- Attorney’s fees.
In Hobby v. Georgia Power Co., the Administrative Review Board affirmed an award of $250,000 in compensatory damages for emotional distress, humiliation, and loss of reputation.
Filing an ERA Whistleblower Retaliation Complaint
An ERA whistleblowing complaint must be filed initially with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) within 180 days of when the whistleblower knew or should have known of the retaliatory adverse action.
Licensee Duty to Maintain Safety Conscious Work Environment
The NRC has published guidance for licensees emphasizing the importance of maintaining safety-conscious environments in which employees feel free to raise safety concerns, both to their management and to the NRC, without fear of retaliation. In particular, the NRC has articulated the following expectations:
- Employers licensed by the NRC must have processes in place for employees to report safety concerns;
- Subcontractors have the same responsibilities as licensed entities;
- Senior management must involve themselves to the extent necessary to ensure all safety concerns are addressed; and
- Employees have a responsibility to raise safety concerns with their employer, and a right to bring concerns to the NRC if the employer fails to address them.
The NRC’s “Guidance for Establishing and Maintaining a Safety Conscious Work Environment” is available here.
The whistle-blower provisions of the ERA provide a strong remedy for whistleblowers in the nuclear energy industry. To learn if you have a potential whistleblower retaliation claim, call the Zuckerman Law Whistleblower Protection Help Line at 202-262-8959 or email [email protected].
For more information, go to Whistleblower Protection in the Nuclear Industry
