To obtain economic damages (lost pay and benefits) in an employment-related lawsuit, you must show that you tried to mitigate your damages, i.e., you searched … Continued
Yes. According to the DC Circuit’s 2017 opinion in Samuel Ortiz-Diaz v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, No. 15-5008, “Although lateral transfers to different … Continued
Section 510 of ERISA makes it unlawful for a person to “discharge, fine, expel, discipline, or discriminate against a participant or beneficiary for exercising any … Continued
As a general rule, summary judgment is appropriate only “after adequate time for discovery.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). “[S]ummary … Continued
Courts have held that where performance improvement plans and negative performance reviews precede an eventual termination, they may constitute adverse actions. See, e.g., Winston v. Verizon … Continued
Indications that an employer performed a sham investigation of a discrimination complaint include: The employer blindly credits a suspicious denial by the perpetrator of … Continued
Several federal and state anti-retaliation laws prohibit an employer from retaliating against an employee on account of the employee’s testimony or assistance in an investigation. … Continued
Yes. The Supreme Court held in Crawford v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, 555 U.S.271, 279-80 (2009) that an employee’s participation in an employer’s internal investigation … Continued
There aren’t necessarily human resources, policies, and procedures that apply to employers nationwide. There are, however, a number of different anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation … Continued
There’s really no precise formula that the courts use to measure emotional distress damages. But there are a number of different factors that … Continued