SOX Whistleblower Wins at Trial
A federal jury awarded $1.6 million in compensatory damages to Julio Perez in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower retaliation lawsuit. Following extensive post-trial briefing, Judge Loretta Preska issued a decision on August 30, 2016 awarding Dr. Perez $2,706,585.00 in front pay and denying defendant Progenics Pharmaceutical’s motion for a new trial.
Read more about this case in Corporate Counsel’s article How to Help a Whistleblower.
If you have suffered retaliation for whistleblowing, contact us at 202-262-8959 to schedule a confidential consultation with our SOX whistleblower lawyers.
See our tips to get the maximum damages in whistleblower retaliation cases.
Front Pay Can Be Awarded Until Retirement Age
Prevailing SOX whistleblowers are entitled to reinstatement. But where reinstatement is not feasible, a court can order the employer to pay front pay in lieu of reinstatement. The court found that it was not feasible for Dr. Perez to return to work because there was “manifest hostility” between Dr. Perez and Progenics. Indeed, at trial, Progenics’ CEO was “condescending, contemptuous, and patronizing” to Dr. Perez.
Dr. Perez asserted that his front pay should consist of earnings from his age at the time of the verdict, 58 years and 2 months, until a reasonable retirement age of 66 years and 6 months. Progenics, however, contended that Dr. Perez’s calculation of front pay was speculative.
The court credited Dr. Perez’s testimony that he made a good-faith effort to find comparable work for over seven years and that “his prospects for future employment are unpromising in part due to Defendant’s violations of his rights.” Accordingly, the court adopted Dr. Perez’s calculation of front pay in the amount of $2,706,585.00. Judge Preska cited the Second Circuit’s decision in Whittlesey v. Union Carbide Corp., 742 F.2d 724, 729 (2d Cir.1984), an age discrimination case holding that when calculating front pay, the Court should “assume, absent evidence to the contrary, that the illegally discharged employee would have continued working for the employer until he or she reached normal retirement age.”
Judge Preska’s decision to award front pay through retirement age soundly reflects the reality that corporate whistleblowers often encounter substantial challenges finding comparable work and suffer significant reputational harm.
Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Damages
Though the whistleblower protection provision of SOX does not authorize an award of punitive damages, a SOX whistleblower can recover “all relief necessary to make the employee whole,” including reinstatement, back pay, attorney’s fees, and costs. 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(c). “Special damages” include damages for impairment of reputation, personal humiliation, mental anguish and suffering, and other noneconomic harm resulting from retaliation. In contrast to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, there is no cap on an award of special damages or non-economic damages under SOX.
A recent verdict demonstrates that SOX special damages can be substantial. In March 2014, a California jury awarded $6 million to Catherine Zulfer in her SOX whistleblower retaliation case against Playboy, Inc. (“Playboy”). Zulfer, a former accounting executive, alleged that Playboy had terminated her in retaliation for raising concerns about executive bonuses to Playboy’s chief financial officer (“CFO”) and chief compliance officer (“CCO”). She contended that she had been instructed by Playboy’s CFO to set aside $1 million for executive bonuses that had not been approved by the board of directors. Zulfer refused to carry out this instruction, warning Playboy’s General Counsel that the bonuses were contrary to Playboy’s internal controls over financial reporting. Shortly after Zulfer’s disclosure, the CFO retaliated by ostracizing Zulfer, excluding her from meetings, forcing her to take on additional duties, and eventually terminating her employment. At trial, a jury awarded Zulfer $6 million in compensatory damages.
SOX Whistleblower Lawyer’s Guide to Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Retaliation Law
The whistleblower protection provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides robust protection to corporate whistleblowers, and indeed some SOX whistleblowers have achieved substantial recoveries. For example, a former in-house counsel at a biotechnology company recovered $11 million in a SOX whistleblower retaliation case alleging that the company fired him for disclosing violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Zuckerman Law has released a guide to the SOX whistleblower protection law: Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protection: Robust Protection for Corporate Whistleblowers. The guide summarizes SOX whistleblower protections and offers concrete tips for corporate whistleblowers based on lessons learned during years of litigating SOX whistleblower cases.
The goal of the guide is to arm corporate whistleblowers with the knowledge to effectively combat whistleblower retaliation, avoid the pitfalls that can weaken a SOX whistleblower case, and formulate an effective strategy to obtain the maximum recovery.
Download our free guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower protection law:
Experienced Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Whistleblower Attorneys
The SOX whistleblower lawyers at Zuckerman Law have substantial experience litigating Sarbanes Oxley whistleblower retaliation claims and have achieved substantial recoveries for officers, executives, accountants, auditors, and other senior professionals. To learn more about corporate whistleblower protections, see our Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protection FAQ.
Click here to read client testimonials about the firm’s work in SOX whistleblower matters and other employment-related litigation.
To schedule a free preliminary consultation, click here or call us at 202-262-8959.
SOX and Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Protections
Protections for SEC Whistleblowers Post-Digital Realty (11-6-2020)SOX Whistleblower Retaliation
Leading whistleblower law firm Zuckerman Law has written extensively about whistleblower protections and is quoted frequently in the media on this topic. A sample of those blog posts and articles appears below:
- Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Win Shows Strong Need For Whistleblower Protections
- DOL Adopts Strengthened Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Regulations
- Jury Awards Former Bio-Rad Counsel $11M in Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Case
- Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Decision Clarifies Broad Scope of Protected Whistleblowing
- Decision Denying Motion for Summary Judgment Broadly Construes Sarbanes-Oxley Protected Whistleblowing
- Sarbanes-Oxley Protects Disclosures About Inadequate Information Security Controls
- Jury Awards Six Million Dollars to Whistleblower in Sarbanes-Oxley Case
- Sarbanes-Oxley Authorizes Damages for Reputational Harm
- OSHA Orders Bank to Reinstate Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower
- Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Prevails on Appeal
- Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Obtains $2.7M in Front Pay
- SOX Whistleblower Decision Adopts Favorable Pleading Standard for Whistleblowers
- OSHA Orders Wells Fargo to Pay $5.4M to Whistleblower
- District Court Rejects Materiality Requirement for Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Actions
- SARBANES-OXLEY WHISTLEBLOWER CASE CLARIFIES THE BURDEN FOR PLEADING KNOWLEDGE OF PROTECTED WHISTLEBLOWING
- Whistleblowing Fraud Investigator Defeats Motion to Dismiss Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Case
- Third Circuit Decision Highlights Key Procedural Distinctions Between Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Protection Provisions
- Federal Courts Are Adopting the Administrative Review Board’s Broad Interpretation of Sarbanes-Oxley Protected Conduct
- Are cybersecurity whistleblowers protected against retaliation?
- Court Rules that Whistleblowers Can Use Confidential Company Documents to Expose Fraud
- Fifth Circuit Holds that “Outing” a Whistleblower is an Adverse Action Under SOX
- Court Rules for In-House Counsel Whistleblower
- Leading SEC Whistleblower Law Firm Featured in Article About Growing Wave of Whistleblower Lawsuits
- Pro Se Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Prevails in Jury Trial
- Whistleblower Lawyer Interviewed About Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Protection Provision
- A Wells Fargo whistleblower warned about fake accounts in 2011 — nobody from the government ever spoke with her
- Whistleblower Lawyer Dallas Hammer Quoted About Cybersecurity Whistleblowing
- Tax Notes Quotes Whistleblower Lawyer Zuckerman About SOX Whistleblower Case
- Article Reports on Petition to Strengthen Whistleblower Rights
- Whistleblower Lawyer Zuckerman Quoted About OSHA Whistleblower Investigations
- Whistleblower Lawyer Quoted About Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Development
- Whistleblower Lawyer Jason Zuckerman Quoted About Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protection
- Forbes Quotes Whistleblower Attorney Jason Zuckerman About Self-Help Discovery in Whistleblower Litigation
- Federal Courts Are Adopting the Administrative Review Board’s Broad Interpretation of Sarbanes-Oxley Protected Conduct
- DOL Clarifies Burden-Shifting Framework For Whistleblowers, Law 360 (October 2016)
- The Evolution Of SOX: A Powerful Remedy For Retaliation, Law 360 (May 2016)
- Whistleblower Protections and Incentives for Auditors and Accountants, Accounting Today (May 2016)
- 2016 Annual Update on the Whistleblower Provisions of SOX, American Bar Association Section of Labor and Employment Law Subcommittee on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (February 2016)
- Sixth Circuit Hands A Landmark Victory To SOX Whistleblowers, Law 360 (June 2015)
- A Year For Whistleblower Rewards And Protections, Law 360 (December 2014)
- Congress Strengthens Whistleblower Protections for Federal Employees, ABA Section of Labor and Employment Law (December 2012)
- Whistleblowers: What Protections And Forms of Relief Are Available For Foreign-Based Employees, ABA Section Of International Law Spring 2011 Meeting (March 2011)
- Law 360 Quotes Whistleblower Attorney Jason Zuckerman About Fifth Circuit Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Decision
- Law 360 Quotes Whistleblower Lawyer Jason Zuckerman on Seminal Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Decision
- Whistleblower Attorney Zuckerman Quoted in Article About Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protection Decisions
- Law 360 Quotes Whistleblower Lawyer Jason Zuckerman on Seminal Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Decision
- Law360 Quotes Whistleblower Lawyer Jason Zuckerman About Sarbanes-Oxley Causation Standard
- Whistleblower Attorney Jason Zuckerman Quoted in Law360 Article About Whistleblower Self-Help Discovery
- Whistleblower Advocate Jason Zuckerman Quoted in Article About In-House Attorney Whistleblower Lawsuits
- Whistleblower Lawyer Hammer Quoted by Bloomberg About Rebound in Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Retaliation Claims
- Whistleblower Lawyer Quoted About Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Development
- Whistleblower Lawyer Interviewed About the Rise of Cybersecurity Whistleblowing